|
This week is National Education Week in our school district and that means parents, grandparents and anyone close to the family can come visit schools and observe the classrooms. Usually, this week is a source of great pride for me as a parent. First, the elementary school that my daughters attend is outstanding. The PTA is extremely active and faculty and staff is top notch. Second, our daughters truly make us proud. They are attentive and participant.
This week though was a source of controversy—at least for one of our family members. As an observer in our daughter's pre-k class, this family member saw the teacher toss out a harmless question, “What is a family?” The aftermath has resulted in a furious debate. The term homosexual agenda was tossed around and some heated emails. The root of all the debate is how the teacher defined what a family is. The teacher said a family was, "Two adults and their children."
There are any number of reasons why a teacher would say this. First and foremost is to protect children. Why should children be made to feel different because they come from a non-traditional household? That might include homes where caregivers are grandparents, a single mom or dad and their significant others or (heaven forbid) a homosexual couple.
Is this the homosexual agenda we have been told to fear? A teacher saying a family is made up of two adults and their children? Is my school doing the right thing here by using this definition? What is your opinion? Should we be teaching our children to fear those who are different and foster feelings of resentment and even hate? Or, should we be teaching acceptance and love?

written by Patrick D., November 18, 2009
written by Zerzix, November 18, 2009
We are not supposed to judge people, that right is reserved for God alone. But, that does not mean that we should accept that which we believe is wrong. We should also not Force people to accept what they believe is wrong.
I will not condemn you for being gay, but I do not thing you deserver any special recognitions or right because you chose to be gay. Yes, I think being gay is a choice not a genetic disposition.
written by Daddy Files, November 18, 2009
Zerzix: You don't have to believe anything. But when your beliefs insult a whole group of people who haven't done anything wrong, then that's unacceptable. If you don't like gay people, then don't be gay. But they're not asking for special privileges, they're asking for basic rights. They're asking for equality, and they're entitled to it.
written by Zerzix, November 18, 2009
written by Zerzix, November 18, 2009
written by Russ, November 18, 2009
written by awldun, November 18, 2009
written by Daddy Files, November 18, 2009
But when opinions stop us from treating all human being equally in the eyes of the LAW, then that is a problem. So they're gay. Big deal! They're doing their thing, you're doing yours. Why is it a bad thing for them to have equal standing? Why is it a bad thing for them to adopt kids and raise them in a loving home? If you haven't noticed, there's more than one gay dad on here and I think it's outrageous to tell them they are second class citizens somehow.
The bigger question -- and I've asked this many times with no good answer from critics -- is HOW DO GAY PEOPLE NEGATIVELY AFFECT YOU? That's all I want to know. How do gay people impact your life in any way, shape or form?
I look forward to your answer.
written by GunnyMo, November 18, 2009
Now, I'm not saying every religious person is like that. Far from it. The problem is that the one's who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, the one's who really do love their neighbors and practice christian love don't get air time or political contributions. It's the radical nutjobs with their "it's morally wrong" crap that shout the loudest.
Since it deals directly with the idea of "family" let me speak, for a moment, on marriage. The rightwing wackos like to claim that marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman. Having a bit of recent experience with marriage and divorce I can tell you without a doubt that these people are absolute hypocrites. Marriage is not sacred in this country and it never has been. I spent two hours...two tiny hours...at divorce court and probably saw at least fifty couples getting their divorces finalized. The divorce rate in America hovers around 50%...and straight people are the only ones getting married (for the most part)! There's a new movement going around trying to ban divorce to preserve the sanctity of marriage. Sign me up! Let's see how many marriage sanctity hypocrites jump on that bandwagon.
A family is at least two or more people who love, cherish and take care of each other. Who's fucking who among the adults in that family really has no bearing on the definition whatsoever.
So before you decide to spout off about morality, try looking to your own morals first. Try remembering what Jesus said and did in your sacred texts. Jesus was about love, peace and harmony among people. Not hatred. You cannot pick and choose what to believe in the Bible if you are to call yourself moral and christian. It's all or nothing, kiddies.
(PS: I know wherefore I speak. I grew up in the church as a preacher's kid. I spent the first twenty years of my life buried in that miasma of hypocrisy and the last eighteen digging myself out.)
written by stephencon, November 18, 2009
written by Zerzix, November 18, 2009
@daddy files: I tried to not bring this to an argument over whether or not it is right to be gay. Yes, you have the right to be gay if you choose. Wanting things to be changed because you chose to be gay is wrong. My wife and I have openly gay friends. I do not hold the fact that they are gay against them, but I will not give them special consideration when it comes to our plans due to the fact they are gay.
As for how has a Gay person affected me personally, it may not be negative in your opinion, when it comes to explaining why this man wants to be with another man and not a woman to my eight year old.
There is one simple fact in life; children may say some of the smartest thing with out knowing it. The fact that most children, unless brought up within a “same-sex” relationship, will naturally ask why and think something is not right should make you think about the situation. Being gay is not natural, the human race can not continue with out opposite sex relation ships, and small children know this instinctively.
I will not hate anyone for choosing to be gay, but when they want to force the idea that it is perfectly normal to be gay is where I find problems.
The fact that you have to specify “Same-Sex Marriage” vs. “Traditional Marriage”, and take the time to teach this concept to children is where I have an issue. Children understand the basic concept of marriage, with out this basic concept there would be no children to understand it. The understand marriage as two people who want to be together and have children. As soon as they understand that children can only come from a man and a woman together they start to question the entire “Same-Sex Relationship.”
I don’t like the fact that I have to tell my children it is ok for those two men or those two women to be together like that when I know that it is against nature and the basics of continuing the Human race.
written by Patrick D., November 18, 2009
Children, who think eating boogers is perfectly normal. Children, who think babies come from your stomach. Children, who believe that a fairy comes at night and gives money for teeth and that an obese man someones breaks in and leaves presents. THAT'S how you justify attacking gay marriage. Children KNOW NOTHING that they aren't taught.
So if they're confused, it's a reflection of how they were raised.
written by ciara, November 18, 2009
written by Daddy Files, November 18, 2009
Zerzix: I just wrote an 2 page response debunking everything you just said. And then I erased it. Because trying to convince a judgmental, close-minded bigot that they're wrong is an act of futility. To think that you are judge and jury on what is "natural" and "right" is downright laughable. And frankly, the only proof I need that you're dead wrong (and you are dead wrong) is my family photo. Which includes my gay aunt, her wife (because Massachusetts has the good sense not to discriminate against others) and their five children. Five artificially inseminated children. Five artificially inseminated children who turned out to be loving, tolerant, accepting, intelligent kids who will one day forgive the hostility and hatred spewed at them by your kids, who are apparently being brought up to believe anything that is different is wrong.
If you want to pray for someone, pray for them.
written by scojo4, November 18, 2009
written by mytwodaddies, November 18, 2009
I do have choices as a gay man. To be with a partner I am attracted to or not be with anyone. You are saying it's a choice. This MUST mean you could choose to be with a man. Is that correct?...Then that would call you bisexual. Are you attracted to both men and women Zerzix? Did you just simply make the choice to be with a woman because you find it morally acceptable? or because you are simply not attracted to men?...Plesae think about this concept.
Joeprah, I like this post. I think the teacher should not have even said two adults. My definition of a family is....Individuals that live together and love each other and support each other.
Peace and Love,
paul(mytwodaddies)
written by Daddy Files, November 19, 2009
But actually, back to the main point in Joeprah's column...
I'm curious why the homosexual agenda comment came up at all? Did the teacher specifically mention gay families? Or was it just assumed by some that she was catering to gay people with her vague definition of family? Because the only thing I do agree with Zerzix on is the fact that single parents should've been more upset by her comment than anyone else.
written by Veronica, November 19, 2009
Daddy Files,
As much as I have disagreed with you before I have to say I am always very impressed with how you stick up for gay people's equal rights. ...it feels weird to even have to type that since a person is a person, and we should all have equal rights. I will never understand the people who feel the need to say otherwise, as you said...what have gay people done to negatively effect anyone in anyway ever? I can not think of one thing.
Zerzix
It is people like you that make this world such a painfull and hurtfull place. You are telling these people that they do not have the right to live basically. That because they are gay they should not be allowed to love anyone, to be with anyone, to have children, or to have a family. You are close minded, you are ignorant, you are hurtfull, and just plain cold hearted and I can only pray that your children will see through your bullshit and form decent opinions of their own. Because the last thing this world needs is more people like you.
written by Zerzix, November 19, 2009
What is next for alternative Lifestyles that will start being pushed when they "Gay Agenda" is fully realized? Beastiality? just some food for thought there.
written by pjmullen, November 19, 2009
Keith @ Almighty Dad had a great post this summer about about 10 Life Lessons Taught Through Music and his #2 was 'People are People' by Depeche Mode. I think that really fits here. Here's a link to the post in case you're interested:
http://www.almightydad.com/education/10-life-lessons-tought-through-music-–-with-a-bonus
written by Patrick D., November 19, 2009
Look carefully everyone. This is why you shouldn't believe the bullshit 'tolerance' that most Christians tell you they have for gay folks. Because deep down, they equate gay people with people who f*ck animals. That's how screwed up their heads are.
"Beastiality? just some food for thought there." [sic]
Sorry, dude, I don't eat shit. And that's the 'food' you're peddling.
written by Zerzix, November 19, 2009
I just feel that this "Alternative Lifestyle should not be force as normal. It is an alternative to the normal, just as Alternative-fule is an alternative to the common fule used. You choose you life style and all that may come with it, as I choose mine and what it may entail.
I wish you, your partner and your family the best. God Bells you and your family.
Others
I am the only one here being civil. I have not resorted to name calling or profanity. I stated my opinion and belief. I tried early to say "lets just agree to disagree" and end it. You all want to push the subject, which I tried to change back to the main subject, the definition of family.
I am not bashing gays here; I am even saying they have all the right to be gay if they want to be gay and love who they want. I am not bashing religion, I even said that God is the only rightful judge in this case.
If you wish to continue to flame and drag this out, which will not change my opinion or belief, feel free. I am done with this one for now, I will see you all in the next topic that you want to flame me in.
written by Reesa, November 19, 2009
written by Daddy Files, November 19, 2009
Reesa: You said "I do not think the gay lifestyle is normal, but I don't judge any of that." Are you kidding me? YOU JUST JUDGED ALL GAYS! You judged their lifestyle to be abnormal, and in the same breath you try to tell everyone you're not judging. You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
And then you say you have gay friends. And to prove how great you are, you claim you don't try to change them. Well holy shit! Do you want a medal?? You're not supposed to want to change your friends. Telling people you aren't trying to change your friends is not really something to brag about. Friends automatically accept each other no matter what. But apparently you want a special pat on the back because you're accepting of the "abnormal" lifestyle.
The hypocrisy is stunning.
written by scojo4, November 19, 2009
@ressa You hit it on the head when you said "you won't believe it" - At this point, no matter what is said, no one wants to change their mind.
Can't we all just get along.
written by Daddy Files, November 20, 2009
written by BellaDaddy, November 20, 2009
Joe, you know how I feel...the Teacher was being PC...and I have to commend them for that....their working environment is completely hostile when it comes to parents wanting their children to learn "their way"...fine...homeschool them...get them out of the way of children and parents who want a good education....Education that entails every aspect of life, history...AND yes, even religion!!!
Personally, I want my child to know the differences in religion...I want her to make her OWN choices as to which religion she is comfortable with...if any. Ironic, don't you think? We DO NOT CHOOSE to be Gay, but we DO CHOOSE our religions and religious beliefs....not to mention how we interpet the bible(s). Why else would there be THOUSANDS of religions?
To each their own...and Yes, that (should) include EVERYONE...regardless of, well ANYTHING!
I cant type anymore, I am so FRIKKIN PISSED OFF! How dare you!!! Opinions are one thing. Accusations, speculation and pure hypocrisy are another!!! Period!
written by eyesofbabes, November 20, 2009
More practically and specifically, I think it is important that teachers be as respectful as possible to all types of families but also extremely important that parents talk to their kids about what they learned in school and what they believe.
As far as my two cents on all the specifics of this back and forth . . . as we all know, but some refuse to accept, being gay is not a choice. I cannot choose to be gay anymore than I chose to be straight. That is just who I am, how I was born. I lived in Moscow for two years and talked to people about the extreme persecution of homosexuals in that country (and in many others) – would someone choose to be sent to Siberia to die if it was indeed a choice? That’s ridiculous.
But, if it were a choice, so what? As daddyfiles said, I have yet to hear one legitimate reason how homosexuality or gay marriage adversely affects anyone. Don’t tell me that you think it is wrong without telling me why. But, nobody can because it is not wrong.
One of the problems I have with religion is that many people (not all) who have blind faith and fear of god are just that, blind and afraid. They ignore the facts and don’t take in the truth because they need to believe what justifies their faith and their prejudice. It may be futile to try and convince someone who thinks being gay is a choice because of a blind religious conviction but, I know if we teach our children the truth – to love and respect all and not judge - religious bigotry will die off with future generations (or should I say it will evolve away).
written by Jesus has 2 Daddies, November 20, 2009
For more on us, check out my blog:
http://jesushas2daddies.blogspot.com/
written by Jessjess, November 20, 2009
No really, they are. Out of the things I would have to explain to a child, homosexuality is not my greatest worry. I have to explain why pets die, why parents have to work, why birds have wings and people do not, why some people are smarter or faster or stronger than others, why people have different religions, why we fight, why we go "have to" to church.
All of these things need to be explained, but all of them are natural. Some are sad, some are joyous, but at the end of the day we teach our children to accept life as it is, and to not judge.
Putting aside /what/ we base on conclusions on, let me grant you everything you've stated @Zerzix. Let's presume homosexuality is a choice, that it is unnatural (in terms of reproduction, etc), and even (oh my gosh!) that it goes against your religion.
But you know what? The use of electricity and medicine is against some religions. It is unnatural and it is a choice. But that does not mean we keep electricity from becoming a standard for technology, or stop promoting the development of medicine for those who want it. Breeding hundreds of animals, caging them, and slaughtering them by the hundreds for their meat is unnatural, and it's a choice, and it's very very commonly accepted.
What does it mean to force you to accept what you believe to be wrong? Does it mean we turn you gay? No, that's not what we're doing at all. Does it mean we force you to be friends with gays? No, not even that. Does it mean we need you to recognize that gays are human beings too, and, so long as they do not hurt anyone, ought to be respected as such? Yes.
You argue you are for tolerance, but against gay marriage. What are we really trying to achieve? We want to allow people, yes even homosexuals, to love and care for one another. That is all. That /is/ tolerance.
Regardless of whether you believe it is immoral, what harm would such a thing do to you? Far less than the harm caused by, say, the pollution from your car.






