Avatar
Vigilante Parenting: Judge, Jury…and Executioner?
Friday, 20 November 2009 10:33
Written by peteej
(0 votes, average 0 out of 5)

When my kids do something wrong, I’m quick to respond by pointing out the problem and doling out the appropriate punishment. As a parent and a dad, I am the judge and jury. No habeas corpus, no fair trial, no jury of your peers. Discipline and punishment pretty much goes like this: you mess up, you accept responsibility, now carry on.

Take that a step further where someone harms your child in some way. Would you feel an urge to extend your vigilantism and deliver the verdict on your own? Personally, I don’t know how I would restrain myself if I was put in the situation, even knowing that the results of my vigilante behavior might ultimately put me in jail. Crimes of passion may seem unreasonable from the outside, but they begin to appear almost logical if placed in a personal and subjective context. Even then, it doesn’t excuse the crime or the offender.

What if a heinous crime occurs within the family among your own children? Like a page taken from Steinbeck’s classic novel, Of Mice and Men, Jamar Pinkney, Sr. decided to play the role of executioner after learning that his 15-year-old son had been molesting his 3-year-old half-sister. Pinkney, who has no previous criminal history, learned of the confession from the boy’s mother, Lazette Cherry, who stated that the confession wasn’t “something you sweep under the rug.”

Unfortunately, Pinkney agreed too much.

After pistol whipping his son repeatedly, he forced the boy outside where the boy was stripped and then shot execution-style in the back of the head, despite pleas by both the boy and his mother. Pinkney later turned himself into authorities and is apparently expressing grief over the whole incident.

I’m not sure how I would respond to news that one child was hurting another, but I can guarantee that execution would not cross my mind. Did the father think that the justice system would do more harm than his own immediate justice? Did this rationale lead Pinkney to believe that killing his own son was more humane than putting him through years of legal proceedings and the stigma of being a sexual offender? More importantly, what should Pinkney have done instead?

The prosecuting attorney said in a statement: "No individual has the right to exact the death penalty on another no matter how reprehensible the behavior. That is why we have laws." Now that Pinkney has taken the law into his own hands and murdered his own son in retaliation for harming his sister, how do you prosecute? Are crimes of passion at all valid in Pinkney’s case (or any case)? What would drive a father to do something like this?

View more news on Pinkney via Google News.



Share this post!Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis
What people have to say (9)Add Comment
Joeprah
...
written by Joeprah, November 20, 2009
Pete, this is crazy. If I had found out something similar I would have assume my child was sick--not kill them. Maybe I'm a big softy, but I say killing your children is sick. Kind of makes you appreciate a dirty room and a shouting match over picking up toys.
Daddy Files
...
written by Daddy Files, November 20, 2009
I agree with Joeprah. This goes well beyond a crime of passion and the issue is much deeper than a father devastated over crimes within the family. The dad in this case is obviously sick or insane (which is undoubtedly the path his defense attorney will lead him down should it come to trial). No matter what my kid does, I wouldn't kill him by shooting him in the back of the head.
pjmullen
...
written by pjmullen, November 20, 2009
Sick barely begins to describe this situation and DF is right that there will be some sort of insanity defense. However, if I was on that jury, there is no way I'd let him off for that. The nature of this execution screams premeditation. I understand that the dad here was upset that his little girl was abused and possibly disappointed in himself that he was unable to protect her from something so indescribably horrible, but that gave him no right to do what he did. I can only hope that he has to spend the rest of his life in a prison cell where he has to live with the memory that he killed his own child no matter what unspeakable crime the son committed.
patrickd88
...
written by Patrick D., November 20, 2009
I'll play Devil's Advocate with the understanding that I don't fully know the case.

Suppose that you replace son with unidentified 15-year-old hoodlum in the house molesting his daughter. See how the scenario changes? Suddenly, someone unknown to you has molested your daughter and you've caught him. You pistol-whip him, but you can't get the image of your barely talking daughter out of your head. You flip and pull the trigger. Immediately, you regret it, but the gun is in your hand and the kid is dead.

(Maybe I should have been a defense attorney? Nah. Couldn't sleep at night.)

For the record, I think he screwed up. Had he just pistol-whipped and then turned the kid into the cops, this would be hardly worth a blog post. Yes, he should probably go to jail for a very long time.
patrickd88
...
written by Patrick D., November 20, 2009
Crap. Sorry. This post is for subscribing.
ciara
...
written by ciara, November 20, 2009
the dad and the kid were both sick. the kid needed help not a head bashing or being killed. but what really triggered his need to kill his son? i can understand anger, but not killing someone.
WeaselMomma
...
written by WeaselMomma, November 21, 2009
This situation is very sad all the way around. The fathers actions are indefensible no matter what level of grief he was feeling. His actions also caused more to his family than had already been done and points to this family having had bigger issues going on prior to any of these events taking place.
Zerzix
...
written by Zerzix, November 21, 2009
Having two daughters myself, I do not know what I would do if I found out someone molested one of them, but that is not the issue here. The father has some real anger management issues to have gone to such extremes. This is a man who maybe should not have a gun in the house. I have some anger management issues myself, but I don’t know if I would ever get angry enough at a family member to kill them.
PC Nena
...
written by PC NenaX, November 30, 2009
This guy, was he the kids father or step father? If he was the step father I can understand it more than I can if it was indeed his biological or adopted son. I can barely understand it as it, being a child. This kid was clearly messed up and likely molested himself by someone in the family or close friend. smilies/sad.gif

My heart hurts for the kid, I cannot imagine what his last moments and thoughts were.

Now I can understand this had it been a grown man was doing this to your child, but not a child to another child. Serious anger management issues and people like that do not need firearms in their home. Mom must have been just as nuts to tell him this and not get the boy out the house into a safer place. She would have had to have known this man was capable of acting this way, perhaps not as extreme but I cannot imagine any mother wanting their child to be pistol whipped or beaten by their spouse or boyfriend.

Write a comment

busy
Thumbnails powered by Thumbshots